According to
MSNBC:
"The (Social Security) trustees do say that the problem over the next 75 years could be remedied by:
Increasing the combined payroll tax rate in a manner equivalent to an immediate and permanent increase of 1.89 percentage points, from the current 12.4 percent to 14.29 percent. For a worker making $60,000 a year, that would amount to a tax increase of $567 a year on the portion of Social Security tax that he pays.
Reducing benefits in a manner equivalent to an immediate and permanent reduction of 12.6 percent.
Shifting $3.7 trillion in general tax revenues into the Social Security system.
Some combination of all of the above."
The problem with these number are that the Trustees assume that the Social Security Administration will be able to redeem the trillions of dollars of US Government debt the SSA has accumulated over the past three decades. These bonds were issued to the Social Security system to compensate for the Social Security surpluses that the Congress has irresponsibly spent over the past few decades.
The trustees claim that if Social Security can redeem these bonds, the system will remain solvent until 2042. However, that requires that the Federal Government finds billions and billions of dollars each year to redeem those bonds, starting in 2013 when the Social Security System begins bringing in less money than it pays out. For the past 30 years or so it has been the exact opposite, Social Security has brought in huge surpluses, which the Congress has quickly spent on everything except Social Security. In short, the SSA holds trillions of dollars of worthless debt that it is planning on from 2013 to 2042, it is debt that the government owes the government, so the problem is much larger than the Trustees are willing to admit.
Some people (like John Sweeny of the AFL-CIO) propose a tax increase dedicated to Social Security, a nice idea. The only problem is that we already have taxes specifically dedicated to Social Security, and they are being spent on other things. Congress wastes the Social Security Surplus every year, so why not start by securing the Social Security Surpluss? Well that requires solving another big problem first, balancing the budget. In fact that requires "balancing the budget" plus reducing spending to the point that we no longer "need" to spend the Social Security surplus on general spending, and that requires something else, telling "needy" constituents no, that is the first thing to do, and for Congress, that will be the hardest.
Timothy Burger